---
title: "Verify every authority in a brief before filing"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/commercial-litigation-and-dispute-resolution/verify-every-authority-in-a-brief-before-filing"
type: "task"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A5-B6-1"
practice_area: "Commercial Litigation & Dispute Resolution"
tier: "red"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["AU"]
last_reviewed: "2026-10-10"
---

# Verify every authority in a brief before filing

> Check AI-produced citations against authorised reports.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/commercial-litigation-and-dispute-resolution/verify-every-authority-in-a-brief-before-filing  
Last reviewed: 2026-10-10

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Commercial Litigation & Dispute Resolution](https://ailawframework.com/practice/commercial-litigation-and-dispute-resolution.md) |
| Human involvement | Red: Lawyer writes; AI may check, clarify or collect data |
| How AI is used | Check AI-produced citations against authorised reports. |
| What the lawyer must review | Costs and referrals follow fake citations. |
| Written for / versions | Australia |

## Checking plan

**Lawyer-led judgement**

The lawyer makes the substantive assessment. Any permitted AI assistance remains supporting work with its own checks.

- What the AI does: Check AI-produced citations against authorised reports.
- What the lawyer does: Costs and referrals follow fake citations.
- Who reviews: Lawyer competent in the matter and the forum
- Basis: Planning guidance checked against the linked public sources on 10 October 2026. Confirm the current instrument before reliance.
- Why: The traffic light follows the consequence of an error and how much of the output the lawyer must check before it is used.
- Restriction: The lawyer leads the substantive decision. Any assistance stays inside the preparation described for this task.
- Written for: AU

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Open the cited source and confirm it is the current instrument for this forum and this date.
2. Costs and referrals follow fake citations.
3. Compare the output with the source and the instructions, including material the output left out.
4. The responsible lawyer approves the exact output for its intended use, or sends it back.

## Notes

- Suggested working checks from the linked public sources. Read the source and confirm it applies to this forum and this date. The checks do not approve software or record that the work is done.

## Practical guide

Jurisdiction: Australia

**Deliverable**: Verify every authority in a brief before filing

**Inputs**

- Mills Oakley: costs against firm over Gen AI
- Federal Court GPN-AI
- The matter instructions and the documents the output will rely on.

**Example**: Stop before the result is filed, sent or relied on. Costs and referrals follow fake citations.

**Stop and escalate when**

- The cited source is not the instrument that applies to this forum or this date.
- The output states a fact, date, citation, figure or commitment that is not in the instructions or the source.
- The responsible lawyer has not approved the exact output for its intended use.

Checked 2026-10-10.

## Sources

- [Mills Oakley: costs against firm over Gen AI](https://www.millsoakley.com.au/insights/australian-federal-court-orders-costs-against-law-firm-over-use-of-generative-ai) (checked 2026-10-10)
- [Federal Court GPN-AI](https://www.fedcourt.gov.au/law-and-practice/practice-documents/practice-notes/gpn-ai) (checked 2026-10-10)

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*