---
title: "Summarise discovery for privilege review with technology-assisted review"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/commercial-litigation-and-dispute-resolution/summarise-discovery-for-privilege-review-with-technology-assisted-review"
type: "task"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A5-B8-3"
practice_area: "Commercial Litigation & Dispute Resolution"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["AU"]
last_reviewed: "2026-10-22"
---

# Summarise discovery for privilege review with technology-assisted review

> Run TAR on a discovery set.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/commercial-litigation-and-dispute-resolution/summarise-discovery-for-privilege-review-with-technology-assisted-review  
Last reviewed: 2026-10-22

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Commercial Litigation & Dispute Resolution](https://ailawframework.com/practice/commercial-litigation-and-dispute-resolution.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | Run TAR on a discovery set. |
| What the lawyer must review | Lawyer reviews privilege calls. |
| Written for / versions | 1 jurisdiction versions below |

## Checking plan

**Source-by-source verification**

Summarise discovery for privilege review with technology-assisted review

- What the AI does: Run TAR on a discovery set.
- What the lawyer does: Lawyer reviews privilege calls.
- Basis: Area-specific AU source in links
- Written for: AU
- Source basis: Area-specific AU source in links

## Sources

- [Legg et al, GenAI in litigation (2025) UNSWLJ](https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/journals/UNSWLawJl/2025/40.html) (checked 2026-10-10)

## Forms and precedents for this task

| Form or precedent | Kind | AI level | Summary |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Litigation hold notice (federal civil)](https://ailawframework.com/precedents/commercial-litigation-and-dispute-resolution/us-litigation-hold-notice.md) | Notice | Yellow | Notice to a client's custodians to keep documents and electronically stored information once federal litigation is reasonably anticipated, with a counsel log of the steps taken. |
| [Rule 26(f) discovery-plan report](https://ailawframework.com/precedents/commercial-litigation-and-dispute-resolution/us-rule-26f-discovery-plan.md) | Court document | Yellow | Joint report of the parties' Rule 26(f) conference for a United States district court, covering disclosures, phasing, ESI, privilege and the orders they will ask for under Rules 26(c) and 16(b). |
| [Stipulated protective order (federal civil)](https://ailawframework.com/precedents/commercial-litigation-and-dispute-resolution/us-stipulated-protective-order.md) | Court document | Yellow | Stipulation and proposed order under Rule 26(c) for confidential commercial information in a federal civil case, with a Rule 502(d) non-waiver clause and a reminder that designation is not sealing. |
| [ESI discovery protocol](https://ailawframework.com/precedents/commercial-litigation-and-dispute-resolution/us-esi-protocol.md) | Agreement | Yellow | Agreement on preservation, search, and the form of production of electronically stored information in a federal civil case, for use with the Rule 26(f) report or as its own stipulation. |

Signed-in accounts can read the full text of each one.

## Jurisdiction versions

| Jurisdiction | Level |
| --- | --- |
| [United States](https://ailawframework.com/practice/commercial-litigation-and-dispute-resolution/summarise-discovery-for-privilege-review-with-technology-assisted-review/united-states.md) | Yellow |

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*