---
title: "Investigate AI tools for document collation as ordered by the court"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/commercial-litigation-and-dispute-resolution/investigate-ai-tools-for-document-collation-as-ordered-by-the-court"
type: "task"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A5-B6-3"
practice_area: "Commercial Litigation & Dispute Resolution"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["AU"]
last_reviewed: "2026-10-10"
---

# Investigate AI tools for document collation as ordered by the court

> Assess AI for chronologies, summaries and document management.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/commercial-litigation-and-dispute-resolution/investigate-ai-tools-for-document-collation-as-ordered-by-the-court  
Last reviewed: 2026-10-10

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Commercial Litigation & Dispute Resolution](https://ailawframework.com/practice/commercial-litigation-and-dispute-resolution.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | Assess AI for chronologies, summaries and document management. |
| What the lawyer must review | Follow court orders like Lee J's s 37P(2) orders. |
| Written for / versions | Australia |

## Checking plan

**Source-by-source verification**

Trace relied-on content to independent sources and check for relevant material the output has missed.

- What the AI does: Assess AI for chronologies, summaries and document management.
- What the lawyer does: Follow court orders like Lee J's s 37P(2) orders.
- Who reviews: Lawyer competent in the matter and the forum
- Basis: Planning guidance checked against the linked public sources on 10 October 2026. Confirm the current instrument before reliance.
- Why: The traffic light follows the consequence of an error and how much of the output the lawyer must check before it is used.
- Written for: AU

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Open the cited source and confirm it is the current instrument for this forum and this date.
2. Follow court orders like Lee J's s 37P(2) orders.
3. Compare the output with the source and the instructions, including material the output left out.
4. The responsible lawyer approves the exact output for its intended use, or sends it back.

## Notes

- Suggested working checks from the linked public sources. Read the source and confirm it applies to this forum and this date. The checks do not approve software or record that the work is done.

## Practical guide

Jurisdiction: Australia

**Deliverable**: Investigate AI tools for document collation as ordered by the court

**Inputs**

- QLS Proctor: Lee J orders AI evidence probe (Sep 2026)
- Judicial Commission NSW: AI and litigation
- The matter instructions and the documents the output will rely on.

**Example**: Stop before the result is filed, sent or relied on. Follow court orders like Lee J's s 37P(2) orders.

**Stop and escalate when**

- The cited source is not the instrument that applies to this forum or this date.
- The output states a fact, date, citation, figure or commitment that is not in the instructions or the source.
- The responsible lawyer has not approved the exact output for its intended use.

Checked 2026-10-10.

## Sources

- [QLS Proctor: Lee J orders AI evidence probe (Sep 2026)](https://www.qlsproctor.com.au/2026/09/judge-orders-parties-to-probe-use-of-ai-to-prepare-evidence/) (checked 2026-10-10)
- [Judicial Commission NSW: AI and litigation](https://www.judcom.nsw.gov.au/publications/benchbks/judicial_officers/artificial_intelligence_and_litigation.html) (checked 2026-10-10)

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*