---
title: "Prepare written submissions so every authority can be opened and checked"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/commercial-litigation-and-dispute-resolution/draft-written-submissions-from-the-evidence-table/united-kingdom"
type: "task_jurisdiction_version"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A5-T1-R5-UK"
practice_area: "Commercial Litigation & Dispute Resolution"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["UK"]
last_reviewed: "2026-10-18"
---

# Prepare written submissions so every authority can be opened and checked

> Draft the structure and argument from the evidence table and list every authority with the authoritative source where it can be read.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/commercial-litigation-and-dispute-resolution/draft-written-submissions-from-the-evidence-table/united-kingdom  
Last reviewed: 2026-10-18

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Commercial Litigation & Dispute Resolution](https://ailawframework.com/practice/commercial-litigation-and-dispute-resolution.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | Draft the structure and argument from the evidence table and list every authority with the authoritative source where it can be read. |
| What the lawyer must review | Read each authority in full from an authoritative source and remove anything you cannot verify. Watch for the signs the judiciary flags: unfamiliar citations, US authorities and American spelling. If you relied on a junior's AI-assisted research, the duty to check is still yours (Ayinde at [8]). |
| Written for | United Kingdom (England and Wales) |
| Applies to | [Draft written submissions from the evidence table](https://ailawframework.com/practice/commercial-litigation-and-dispute-resolution/draft-written-submissions-from-the-evidence-table.md) |

## Checking plan

- What the AI does: Draft the structure and argument from the evidence table and list every authority with the authoritative source where it can be read.
- Basis: Checked against the linked sources on 18 October 2026. Confirm the current instrument before reliance.

## Notes

- Authoritative sources named in Ayinde: the Government's legislation database, the National Archives' judgments database, the official Law Reports and reputable publishers' databases.
- Barristers: Core Duty 1 (duty to the court) and Core Duty 3 (honesty and integrity).

## Sources

- [R (Ayinde) v Haringey LBC and Al-Haroun v Qatar National Bank 2025 EWHC 1383 (Admin)](https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Ayinde-v-London-Borough-of-Haringey-and-Al-Haroun-v-Qatar-National-Bank.pdf) (checked 2026-10-18)
- [Artificial Intelligence (AI) – Guidance for Judicial Office Holders (31 October 2025)](https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Artificial-Intelligence-AI-Guidance-for-Judicial-Office-Holders-2.pdf) (checked 2026-10-18)
- [Bar Council: Considerations when using ChatGPT and generative AI software (25 November 2025)](https://www.barcouncilethics.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Considerations-when-using-ChatGPT-and-generative-artificial-intelligence-Nov-2025.pdf) (checked 2026-10-18)

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*