---
title: "Check a court document against the judiciary's AI guidance and Ayinde before filing"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/commercial-litigation-and-dispute-resolution/check-a-court-document-against-the-ai-practice-note-before-filing/united-kingdom"
type: "task_jurisdiction_version"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A5-V20260923-3-UK"
practice_area: "Commercial Litigation & Dispute Resolution"
tier: "red"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["UK"]
last_reviewed: "2026-10-18"
---

# Check a court document against the judiciary's AI guidance and Ayinde before filing

> Extract the court or tribunal, the document type, and a table of every authority, quotation and factual assertion for the lawyer to verify.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/commercial-litigation-and-dispute-resolution/check-a-court-document-against-the-ai-practice-note-before-filing/united-kingdom  
Last reviewed: 2026-10-18

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Commercial Litigation & Dispute Resolution](https://ailawframework.com/practice/commercial-litigation-and-dispute-resolution.md) |
| Human involvement | Red: Lawyer writes; AI may check, clarify or collect data |
| How AI is used | Extract the court or tribunal, the document type, and a table of every authority, quotation and factual assertion for the lawyer to verify. |
| What the lawyer must review | Open each authority in legislation.gov.uk, Find Case Law, the official Law Reports or a reputable publisher's database (Ayinde at [7]). Confirm each is genuine, relevant, has a verifiable citation and supports the point (SRA warning notice; Code paras 2.4 and 2.7). No Australian AI practice note applies. |
| Written for | United Kingdom (England and Wales) |
| Applies to | [Check a court document against the AI practice note before filing](https://ailawframework.com/practice/commercial-litigation-and-dispute-resolution/check-a-court-document-against-the-ai-practice-note-before-filing.md) |

## Checking plan

- What the AI does: Extract the court or tribunal, the document type, and a table of every authority, quotation and factual assertion for the lawyer to verify.
- Basis: Checked against the linked sources on 18 October 2026. Confirm the current instrument before reliance.

## Notes

- Legal representatives are responsible for what they put before the court; disclosure of responsible AI use depends on context.
- Public tools are not capable of reliable legal research (Ayinde at [6]).

## Sources

- [Artificial Intelligence (AI) – Guidance for Judicial Office Holders (31 October 2025)](https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Artificial-Intelligence-AI-Guidance-for-Judicial-Office-Holders-2.pdf) (checked 2026-10-18)
- [R (Ayinde) v Haringey LBC and Al-Haroun v Qatar National Bank 2025 EWHC 1383 (Admin)](https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Ayinde-v-London-Borough-of-Haringey-and-Al-Haroun-v-Qatar-National-Bank.pdf) (checked 2026-10-18)
- [SRA: Misuse of AI – warning notice (17 August 2026)](https://www.sra.org.uk/solicitors/guidance/misuse-ai/) (checked 2026-10-18)

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*