---
title: "Run the members’ removal of a public company director"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/commercial-and-corporate-advisory/run-the-members-removal-of-a-public-company-director"
type: "task"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A1-J20261018-4"
practice_area: "Commercial & Corporate Advisory (contracts, company law, governance)"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
last_reviewed: "2026-10-22"
---

# Run the members’ removal of a public company director

> From the notice of intention, the constitution and the register of members, build the timetable for removing a director by members’ resolution: receipt of the notice of intention, notice to the director, the director’s…

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/commercial-and-corporate-advisory/run-the-members-removal-of-a-public-company-director  
Last reviewed: 2026-10-22

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Commercial & Corporate Advisory (contracts, company law, governance)](https://ailawframework.com/practice/commercial-and-corporate-advisory.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | From the notice of intention, the constitution and the register of members, build the timetable for removing a director by members’ resolution: receipt of the notice of intention, notice to the director, the director’s right to put a statement to members, the meeting date and the lodgement after the resolution, and draft the meeting papers from the firm’s precedents. |
| What the lawyer must review | The lawyer confirms the statutory steps and timing are met, deals with the director’s statement and right to be heard, checks the constitution for any additional requirement, and settles the notice of meeting and resolution. |
| Written for / versions | 1 jurisdiction versions below |

## Checking plan

**Line-by-line review**

Review the complete output at the level of each line, paragraph or clause; check facts, meaning and omissions.

- What the AI does: From the notice of intention, the constitution and the register of members, build the timetable for removing a director by members’ resolution: receipt of the notice of intention, notice to the director, the director’s right to put a statement to members, the meeting date and the lodgement after the resolution, and draft the meeting papers from the firm’s precedents.
- What the lawyer does: The lawyer confirms the statutory steps and timing are met, deals with the director’s statement and right to be heard, checks the constitution for any additional requirement, and settles the notice of meeting and resolution.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Practical workflow informed by the linked primary sources; the traffic light and working checks are editorial guidance, not a court classification.
- Why: The level reflects what the work is, the consequence of an error, and how much of the output the lawyer must independently re-derive.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Check the notice of intention was given at least 2 months before the meeting, or that the exception for a meeting the company calls after receiving the notice applies.
2. Confirm the director received the notice and the chance to put a statement to members.
3. Confirm the company is a public company; proprietary companies follow their constitution.

## Notes

- These are suggested working checks. Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts; the checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

## Sources

- [Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 203D — Removal by members](https://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/ca2001172/s203d.html) (checked 2026-10-18)

## Jurisdiction versions

| Jurisdiction | Level |
| --- | --- |
| [United States](https://ailawframework.com/practice/commercial-and-corporate-advisory/run-the-members-removal-of-a-public-company-director/united-states.md) | Yellow |

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*