---
title: "Map directors' duties and related-party issues under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/commercial-and-corporate-advisory/map-directors-duties-and-related-party-issues-for-a-company-decision/commonwealth"
type: "task_jurisdiction_version"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A1-T1-R5-CTH"
practice_area: "Commercial & Corporate Advisory (contracts, company law, governance)"
tier: "red"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["CTH"]
last_reviewed: "2026-09-23"
---

# Map directors' duties and related-party issues under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)

> From board papers, minutes and registers, list the decision, who benefits, conflicts, and approvals or disclosures under ss 180–184, Ch 2E, Ch 6CA and ASIC guides.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/commercial-and-corporate-advisory/map-directors-duties-and-related-party-issues-for-a-company-decision/commonwealth  
Last reviewed: 2026-09-23

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Commercial & Corporate Advisory (contracts, company law, governance)](https://ailawframework.com/practice/commercial-and-corporate-advisory.md) |
| Human involvement | Red: Lawyer writes; AI may check, clarify or collect data |
| How AI is used | From board papers, minutes and registers, list the decision, who benefits, conflicts, and approvals or disclosures under ss 180–184, Ch 2E, Ch 6CA and ASIC guides. |
| What the lawyer must review | Re-derive the analysis against current ASIC positions and Federal Court decisions Apply s 180(2) to the facts Check the current continuous-disclosure fault element for ASIC and private claims Check changes since the Treasury Laws Amendment (2021 Measures No.1) Act 2021 |
| Written for | Commonwealth |
| Applies to | [Map directors' duties and related-party issues for a company decision](https://ailawframework.com/practice/commercial-and-corporate-advisory/map-directors-duties-and-related-party-issues-for-a-company-decision.md) |

## Checking plan

**Lawyer review required**

The responsible lawyer reviews the work against the instructions, sources and intended use.

- What the AI does: Potential support includes preparing preliminary structure or wording and identifying points for review. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
- What the lawyer does: Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Suggested checking approach based on the task guidance. Complete the assessment for the actual tool, information and jurisdiction.
- Why: The plan reflects the described work and review requirements. Policy colours are not used to determine permission or checking.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Confirm that the actual tool, feature and processing terms permit use of this information, including access, retention, training and disclosure conditions.
2. Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
3. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
4. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

## Notes

- Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*