---
title: "Draft board resolutions and minutes from the meeting papers"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/commercial-and-corporate-advisory/draft-board-resolutions-and-minutes-from-the-meeting-papers"
type: "task"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A1-T1-R9"
practice_area: "Commercial & Corporate Advisory (contracts, company law, governance)"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
last_reviewed: "2026-10-22"
---

# Draft board resolutions and minutes from the meeting papers

> Turn the agenda, papers and notes into draft resolutions, a circular resolution and minutes, listing decisions that still need a recorded vote or conflict disclosure.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/commercial-and-corporate-advisory/draft-board-resolutions-and-minutes-from-the-meeting-papers  
Last reviewed: 2026-10-22

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Commercial & Corporate Advisory (contracts, company law, governance)](https://ailawframework.com/practice/commercial-and-corporate-advisory.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | Turn the agenda, papers and notes into draft resolutions, a circular resolution and minutes, listing decisions that still need a recorded vote or conflict disclosure. |
| What the lawyer must review | Check wording against the constitution and the actual decisions Confirm quorum and conflicts Confirm privileged advice is not copied into the minutes |
| Written for / versions | 1 jurisdiction versions below |

## Checking plan

**Lawyer review required**

The responsible lawyer reviews the work against the instructions, sources and intended use.

- What the AI does: Potential support includes preparing preliminary structure or wording and summarising source material. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
- What the lawyer does: Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Suggested checking approach based on the task guidance. Complete the assessment for the actual tool, information and jurisdiction.
- Why: The plan reflects the described work and review requirements. Policy colours are not used to determine permission or checking.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Trace every relied-on figure to its source, confirm dates and assumptions, and independently recalculate totals or derived amounts.
2. Confirm that the actual tool, feature and processing terms permit use of this information, including access, retention, training and disclosure conditions.
3. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
4. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

## Notes

- Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

## Forms and precedents for this task

| Form or precedent | Kind | AI level | Summary |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Delaware board action by unanimous written consent](https://ailawframework.com/precedents/commercial-and-corporate-advisory/us-board-written-consent.md) | Other | Yellow | Unanimous written consent for the board of a Delaware corporation, under DGCL § 141(f). Every director, or every member of the committee, must consent. The certificate and bylaws are read first. |

Signed-in accounts can read the full text of each one.

## Jurisdiction versions

| Jurisdiction | Level |
| --- | --- |
| [United States](https://ailawframework.com/practice/commercial-and-corporate-advisory/draft-board-resolutions-and-minutes-from-the-meeting-papers/united-states.md) | Yellow |

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*