---
title: "Draft a board, audit or risk-committee charter against the ASX CG Principles (4th edition)"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/commercial-and-corporate-advisory/draft-a-board-audit-or-risk-committee-charter-from-the-constitution/australia"
type: "task_jurisdiction_version"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A1-T1-R11-AU"
practice_area: "Commercial & Corporate Advisory (contracts, company law, governance)"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["AU"]
last_reviewed: "2026-09-23"
---

# Draft a board, audit or risk-committee charter against the ASX CG Principles (4th edition)

> Produce a first-draft charter mapped to the constitution, committee structure and ASX Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations (4th edition, 2019), listing duties beyond current practice.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/commercial-and-corporate-advisory/draft-a-board-audit-or-risk-committee-charter-from-the-constitution/australia  
Last reviewed: 2026-09-23

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Commercial & Corporate Advisory (contracts, company law, governance)](https://ailawframework.com/practice/commercial-and-corporate-advisory.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | Produce a first-draft charter mapped to the constitution, committee structure and ASX Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations (4th edition, 2019), listing duties beyond current practice. |
| What the lawyer must review | Use the 4th edition (2019), not the 3rd (2014) Match the charter to the constitution For Group 1 entities, reflect mandatory AASB S2 (years from 1 January 2025; first reports 2026) Treat AASB S1 as voluntary Check remuneration and diversity disclosure Do not promise more than the board does |
| Written for | Australia |
| Applies to | [Draft a board, audit or risk-committee charter from the constitution](https://ailawframework.com/practice/commercial-and-corporate-advisory/draft-a-board-audit-or-risk-committee-charter-from-the-constitution.md) |

## Checking plan

**Lawyer review required**

The responsible lawyer reviews the work against the instructions, sources and intended use.

- What the AI does: Potential support includes preparing preliminary structure or wording. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
- What the lawyer does: Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Suggested checking approach based on the task guidance. Complete the assessment for the actual tool, information and jurisdiction.
- Why: The plan reflects the described work and review requirements. Policy colours are not used to determine permission or checking.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Trace every relied-on figure to its source, confirm dates and assumptions, and independently recalculate totals or derived amounts.
2. Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
3. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
4. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

## Notes

- Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*