---
title: "Run a first-pass TAR review of the class-action discovery set under GPN-AI"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/class-actions-representative-proceedings/run-a-first-pass-review-of-the-large-discovery-set/australia"
type: "task_jurisdiction_version"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A7-T1-R3-AU"
practice_area: "Class Actions / Representative Proceedings"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["AU"]
last_reviewed: "2026-09-23"
---

# Run a first-pass TAR review of the class-action discovery set under GPN-AI

> From a lawyer-cleared corpus, cluster documents, flag hot families and draft privilege-log entries and an issues list. Lists must conform to FCR rr 20.14–20.17 (GPN-AI).

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/class-actions-representative-proceedings/run-a-first-pass-review-of-the-large-discovery-set/australia  
Last reviewed: 2026-09-23

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Class Actions / Representative Proceedings](https://ailawframework.com/practice/class-actions-representative-proceedings.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | From a lawyer-cleared corpus, cluster documents, flag hot families and draft privilege-log entries and an issues list. Lists must conform to FCR rr 20.14–20.17 (GPN-AI). |
| What the lawyer must review | Conform the list to FCR rr 20.14, 20.15 and 20.17 (GPN-AI, 16 April 2026) Document TAR method, recall, precision and seed set Notify the other side as directed (GPN-CA) Have a lawyer review privilege calls QC-sample produced and withheld sets Keep confidential or suppressed material out of the tool |
| Written for | Australia |
| Applies to | [Run a first-pass review of the large discovery set](https://ailawframework.com/practice/class-actions-representative-proceedings/run-a-first-pass-review-of-the-large-discovery-set.md) |

## Checking plan

**Lawyer review required**

The responsible lawyer reviews the work against the instructions, sources and intended use.

- What the AI does: Potential support includes identifying points for review. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
- What the lawyer does: Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Suggested checking approach based on the task guidance. Complete the assessment for the actual tool, information and jurisdiction.
- Why: The plan reflects the described work and review requirements. Policy colours are not used to determine permission or checking.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Check the current court or regulator requirements, prescribed form and attachments for the intended document and filing.
2. Confirm that the actual tool, feature and processing terms permit use of this information, including access, retention, training and disclosure conditions.
3. Review the original source set for relevant material absent from the output, including contrary evidence, qualifications and unresolved gaps.
4. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
5. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

## Notes

- Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*