---
title: "Compile the court book and a hearing chronology"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/class-actions-representative-proceedings/compile-the-court-book-and-a-hearing-chronology"
type: "task"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A7-T1-R7"
practice_area: "Class Actions / Representative Proceedings"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
last_reviewed: "2026-10-22"
---

# Compile the court book and a hearing chronology

> Draft a bundle index and dated chronology from the pleaded case and key exhibits, and list missing documents.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/class-actions-representative-proceedings/compile-the-court-book-and-a-hearing-chronology  
Last reviewed: 2026-10-22

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Class Actions / Representative Proceedings](https://ailawframework.com/practice/class-actions-representative-proceedings.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | Draft a bundle index and dated chronology from the pleaded case and key exhibits, and list missing documents. |
| What the lawyer must review | Match the index to the final book Source every chronology row |
| Written for / versions | 1 jurisdiction versions below |

## Checking plan

**Lawyer review required**

The responsible lawyer reviews the work against the instructions, sources and intended use.

- What the AI does: Potential support includes extracting and organising information and summarising source material. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
- What the lawyer does: Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Suggested checking approach based on the task guidance. Complete the assessment for the actual tool, information and jurisdiction.
- Why: The plan reflects the described work and review requirements. Policy colours are not used to determine permission or checking.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Open each relied-on authority independently. Confirm its existence, current status, proposition and any quotation or pinpoint reference.
2. Check the current court or regulator requirements, prescribed form and attachments for the intended document and filing.
3. Confirm that the actual tool, feature and processing terms permit use of this information, including access, retention, training and disclosure conditions.
4. Verify dates, people and sequence against contemporaneous records. Preserve uncertainty and identify gaps or conflicting accounts.
5. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
6. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

## Notes

- Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

## Forms and precedents for this task

| Form or precedent | Kind | AI level | Summary |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Deposition outline: class representative and Rule 30(b)(6)](https://ailawframework.com/precedents/class-actions-representative-proceedings/us-class-deposition-outline.md) | Checklist | Yellow | Question outline for the deposition of a proposed class representative and for a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition on the systems that define the class. Questions only. No script of testimony. |

Signed-in accounts can read the full text of each one.

## Jurisdiction versions

| Jurisdiction | Level |
| --- | --- |
| [United States](https://ailawframework.com/practice/class-actions-representative-proceedings/compile-the-court-book-and-a-hearing-chronology/united-states.md) | Yellow |

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*