---
title: "Test an assessor's report against the record"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/child-protection-and-care-proceedings/settle-the-assessment-questions-and-test-the-assessor-s-report-against-t/united-states"
type: "task_jurisdiction_version"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A52-X20260927-8-US"
practice_area: "Child Protection & Care Proceedings"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["US"]
last_reviewed: "2026-10-22"
---

# Test an assessor's report against the record

> For each opinion in the report, list the facts the report cites and the page of the loaded record that contains the same fact, or mark the fact as not found in that record.…

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/child-protection-and-care-proceedings/settle-the-assessment-questions-and-test-the-assessor-s-report-against-t/united-states  
Last reviewed: 2026-10-22

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Child Protection & Care Proceedings](https://ailawframework.com/practice/child-protection-and-care-proceedings.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | For each opinion in the report, list the facts the report cites and the page of the loaded record that contains the same fact, or mark the fact as not found in that record. Write no question to the assessor and no opinion of your own. |
| What the lawyer must review | You decide whether the report can be used. In federal court, Rule 702 permits opinion testimony by a person qualified by knowledge, skill, experience, training or education when the proponent shows it is more likely than not that the specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact, the testimony is based on sufficient facts or data, it is the product of reliable principles and methods, and the opinion reflects a reliable application of those principles and methods to the facts of the case. This comparison does not make that showing. Opinion 512 requires you to check a tool's extract against the document. A dependency hearing in state court follows that court's evidence rule. |
| Written for | United States |
| Applies to | [Settle the assessment questions and test the assessor's report against the record](https://ailawframework.com/practice/child-protection-and-care-proceedings/settle-the-assessment-questions-and-test-the-assessor-s-report-against-t.md) |

## Checking plan

- What the AI does: For each opinion in the report, list the facts the report cites and the page of the loaded record that contains the same fact, or mark the fact as not found in that record. Write no question to the assessor and no opinion of your own.
- Basis: Checked against the linked sources on 22 October 2026. Confirm the current instrument before reliance.

## Notes

- Rule 702 is a federal rule of evidence. California Evidence Code § 801 was not opened.
- A fact marked not found was absent from the loaded record. It may sit on a page that was not loaded.

## Sources

- [Federal Rule of Evidence 702 (testimony by expert witnesses)](https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_702) (checked 2026-10-22)
- [ABA Formal Opinion 512, Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools (29 July 2024)](https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/professional_responsibility/ethics-opinions/aba-formal-opinion-512.pdf) (checked 2026-10-22)

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*