---
title: "Draft prospectus sections and a verification table under Chapter 6D"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/capital-markets-and-securities-ecm-dcm-and-disclosure/draft-prospectus-or-offering-document-sections-and-a-verification-notes/commonwealth"
type: "task_jurisdiction_version"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A4-T1-R1-CTH"
practice_area: "Capital Markets & Securities — ECM/DCM and Disclosure"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["CTH"]
last_reviewed: "2026-09-23"
---

# Draft prospectus sections and a verification table under Chapter 6D

> Draft named offer-document sections from the source files and build a verification table of statements without a source, checking readability against ASIC RG 228.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/capital-markets-and-securities-ecm-dcm-and-disclosure/draft-prospectus-or-offering-document-sections-and-a-verification-notes/commonwealth  
Last reviewed: 2026-09-23

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Capital Markets & Securities — ECM/DCM and Disclosure](https://ailawframework.com/practice/capital-markets-and-securities-ecm-dcm-and-disclosure.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | Draft named offer-document sections from the source files and build a verification table of statements without a source, checking readability against ASIC RG 228. |
| What the lawyer must review | Trace every fact to a primary source Check ss 710–713, 715A and 716–728 on the Federal Register of Legislation Confirm forward-looking statements have reasonable grounds (s 728(1)(c)) Make risks company-specific Confirm s 713 is available Get DDC approval; note s 729 exposure |
| Written for | Commonwealth |
| Applies to | [Draft prospectus or offering-document sections and a verification notes table](https://ailawframework.com/practice/capital-markets-and-securities-ecm-dcm-and-disclosure/draft-prospectus-or-offering-document-sections-and-a-verification-notes.md) |

## Checking plan

**Source-by-source verification**

Trace relied-on content to independent sources and check for relevant material the output has missed.

- What the AI does: Potential support includes preparing preliminary structure or wording and identifying points for review. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
- What the lawyer does: Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Suggested checking approach based on the task guidance. Complete the assessment for the actual tool, information and jurisdiction.
- Why: The plan reflects the described work and review requirements. Policy colours are not used to determine permission or checking.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Open each relied-on authority independently. Confirm its existence, current status, proposition and any quotation or pinpoint reference.
2. Trace every relied-on figure to its source, confirm dates and assumptions, and independently recalculate totals or derived amounts.
3. Check the specialist’s assumptions, qualifications and limits. Obtain the relevant expert or specialist review before relying on a technical conclusion.
4. Obtain and inspect the relevant current official register or search result. Confirm identities, interests and the date and scope of the search.
5. Review the original source set for relevant material absent from the output, including contrary evidence, qualifications and unresolved gaps.
6. Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
7. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
8. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

## Notes

- Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*