---
title: "Draft an ASX announcement and consistency check against Listing Rule 3.1"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/capital-markets-and-securities-ecm-dcm-and-disclosure/draft-a-market-disclosure-announcement-and-consistency-check/australia"
type: "task_jurisdiction_version"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A4-T1-R2-AU"
practice_area: "Capital Markets & Securities — ECM/DCM and Disclosure"
tier: "red"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["AU"]
last_reviewed: "2026-09-23"
---

# Draft an ASX announcement and consistency check against Listing Rule 3.1

> Draft ASX announcement text from the facts brief and compare it with prior disclosure, listing new claims, inconsistencies and possible Listing Rule 3.1 triggers.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/capital-markets-and-securities-ecm-dcm-and-disclosure/draft-a-market-disclosure-announcement-and-consistency-check/australia  
Last reviewed: 2026-09-23

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Capital Markets & Securities — ECM/DCM and Disclosure](https://ailawframework.com/practice/capital-markets-and-securities-ecm-dcm-and-disclosure.md) |
| Human involvement | Red: Lawyer writes; AI may check, clarify or collect data |
| How AI is used | Draft ASX announcement text from the facts brief and compare it with prior disclosure, listing new claims, inconsistencies and possible Listing Rule 3.1 triggers. |
| What the lawyer must review | Decide materiality and the LR 3.1A carve-outs yourself, in real time Confirm timing under ASX GN 8 Check the current fault element for ASIC civil penalty cases (ss 674–674A) Check insider-trading exposure and prior guidance |
| Written for | Australia |
| Applies to | [Draft a market-disclosure announcement and consistency check](https://ailawframework.com/practice/capital-markets-and-securities-ecm-dcm-and-disclosure/draft-a-market-disclosure-announcement-and-consistency-check.md) |

## Checking plan

**Lawyer review required**

The responsible lawyer reviews the work against the instructions, sources and intended use.

- What the AI does: Potential support includes preparing preliminary structure or wording and identifying points for review. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
- What the lawyer does: Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Suggested checking approach based on the task guidance. Complete the assessment for the actual tool, information and jurisdiction.
- Why: The plan reflects the described work and review requirements. Policy colours are not used to determine permission or checking.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Confirm that the actual tool, feature and processing terms permit use of this information, including access, retention, training and disclosure conditions.
2. Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
3. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
4. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

## Notes

- Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*