---
title: "Build a Redfern schedule from the document requests"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/arbitration-and-alternative-dispute-resolution/build-a-redfern-schedule-from-the-document-requests"
type: "task"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A6-T1-R3"
practice_area: "Arbitration & Alternative Dispute Resolution"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
last_reviewed: "2026-10-22"
---

# Build a Redfern schedule from the document requests

> Turn requests, objections and the responsive-document index into a Redfern or disclosure schedule with columns for request, objection, proposed search and status.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/arbitration-and-alternative-dispute-resolution/build-a-redfern-schedule-from-the-document-requests  
Last reviewed: 2026-10-22

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Arbitration & Alternative Dispute Resolution](https://ailawframework.com/practice/arbitration-and-alternative-dispute-resolution.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | Turn requests, objections and the responsive-document index into a Redfern or disclosure schedule with columns for request, objection, proposed search and status. |
| What the lawyer must review | Make privilege and relevance calls yourself Confirm searches match the tribunal's order |
| Written for / versions | 1 jurisdiction versions below |

## Checking plan

**Lawyer review required**

The responsible lawyer reviews the work against the instructions, sources and intended use.

- What the AI does: Potential support includes identifying points for review. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
- What the lawyer does: Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Suggested checking approach based on the task guidance. Complete the assessment for the actual tool, information and jurisdiction.
- Why: The plan reflects the described work and review requirements. Policy colours are not used to determine permission or checking.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Confirm each factual assertion with the witness and original record. Preserve the witness’s own knowledge and words, and check the court’s rules for this document.
2. Review operative clauses in the complete document, including definitions, cross-references, schedules and inconsistencies with the instructions.
3. Confirm that the actual tool, feature and processing terms permit use of this information, including access, retention, training and disclosure conditions.
4. Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
5. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
6. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

## Notes

- Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

## Forms and precedents for this task

| Form or precedent | Kind | AI level | Summary |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Preservation notice when arbitration is anticipated](https://ailawframework.com/precedents/arbitration-and-alternative-dispute-resolution/us-arbitration-preservation-notice.md) | Notice | Yellow | Internal notice to keep documents and electronically stored information when a commercial arbitration is reasonably anticipated or has been demanded, including material a later court petition might… |
| [Conferral letter before an arbitration discovery application](https://ailawframework.com/precedents/arbitration-and-alternative-dispute-resolution/us-arbitration-discovery-conferral-letter.md) | Letter | Yellow | Letter that sets out a document or information dispute in an arbitration and asks for a cure before either side applies to the tribunal or to a court. |

Signed-in accounts can read the full text of each one.

## Jurisdiction versions

| Jurisdiction | Level |
| --- | --- |
| [United States](https://ailawframework.com/practice/arbitration-and-alternative-dispute-resolution/build-a-redfern-schedule-from-the-document-requests/united-states.md) | Yellow |

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*