---
title: "Draft conciliation submissions and a deed of release or FWC s.369 terms"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/anti-discrimination-and-industrial-relations/draft-conciliation-submissions-and-a-deed-of-release/commonwealth"
type: "task_jurisdiction_version"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A15-T1-R14-CTH"
practice_area: "Anti-Discrimination & Industrial Relations"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["CTH"]
last_reviewed: "2026-09-23"
---

# Draft conciliation submissions and a deed of release or FWC s.369 terms

> Draft a deed of release and conciliation terms from the agreed heads, flagging tax characterisation, superannuation, confidentiality and regulator-reporting gaps.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/anti-discrimination-and-industrial-relations/draft-conciliation-submissions-and-a-deed-of-release/commonwealth  
Last reviewed: 2026-09-23

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Anti-Discrimination & Industrial Relations](https://ailawframework.com/practice/anti-discrimination-and-industrial-relations.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | Draft a deed of release and conciliation terms from the agreed heads, flagging tax characterisation, superannuation, confidentiality and regulator-reporting gaps. |
| What the lawyer must review | Scope the release; general releases have caught claims not meant to settle Confirm tax (genuine redundancy, damages or income; ETP under ITAA97 Div 82) or refer to a tax adviser Check superannuation on back-pay Check confidentiality does not stop reports to the AHRC, FWO or WHS regulator or engage the s.47C positive duty Check execution formalities, including state witnessing rules Check the current certificate provision and the 14-day filing window if proceedings follow |
| Written for | Commonwealth |
| Applies to | [Draft conciliation submissions and a deed of release](https://ailawframework.com/practice/anti-discrimination-and-industrial-relations/draft-conciliation-submissions-and-a-deed-of-release.md) |

## Checking plan

**Source-by-source verification**

Trace relied-on content to independent sources and check for relevant material the output has missed.

- What the AI does: Potential support includes preparing preliminary structure or wording and identifying points for review. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
- What the lawyer does: Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Suggested checking approach based on the task guidance. Complete the assessment for the actual tool, information and jurisdiction.
- Why: The plan reflects the described work and review requirements. Policy colours are not used to determine permission or checking.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Trace every relied-on figure to its source, confirm dates and assumptions, and independently recalculate totals or derived amounts.
2. Check the current court or regulator requirements, prescribed form and attachments for the intended document and filing.
3. Review operative clauses in the complete document, including definitions, cross-references, schedules and inconsistencies with the instructions.
4. Confirm that the wording reflects the client’s instructions and contains no unintended admission, concession or commitment. Check the recipient and tone.
5. Confirm that the actual tool, feature and processing terms permit use of this information, including access, retention, training and disclosure conditions.
6. Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
7. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
8. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

## Notes

- Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*