---
title: "Build the schedule of documents for an information-access decision"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/administrative-and-public-law/build-the-schedule-of-documents-for-an-information-access-decision"
type: "task"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A31-X20260927-1"
practice_area: "Administrative & Public Law"
tier: "green"
lawyer_review: "required"
last_reviewed: "2026-10-22"
---

# Build the schedule of documents for an information-access decision

> Draft the schedule rows from the lawyer's marked-up document set: number, date, author and recipient, a neutral description and the folio range, carrying the recorded decision and the provision across for each item…

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/administrative-and-public-law/build-the-schedule-of-documents-for-an-information-access-decision  
Last reviewed: 2026-10-22

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Administrative & Public Law](https://ailawframework.com/practice/administrative-and-public-law.md) |
| Human involvement | Green: AI drafts, lawyer checks |
| How AI is used | Draft the schedule rows from the lawyer's marked-up document set: number, date, author and recipient, a neutral description and the folio range, carrying the recorded decision and the provision across for each item without altering them. List any document with no recorded decision, no folio range, or a description that repeats content the lawyer has marked as exempt. |
| What the lawyer must review | The lawyer confirms the schedule matches the documents actually within scope, that each description discloses nothing exempt, and that the decision and the provision recorded against every row are their own. |
| Written for / versions | 1 jurisdiction versions below |

## Checking plan

**Lawyer review required**

The responsible lawyer reviews the work against the instructions, sources and intended use.

- What the AI does: Draft the schedule rows from the lawyer's marked-up document set: number, date, author and recipient, a neutral description and the folio range, carrying the recorded decision and the provision across for each item without altering them. List any document with no recorded decision, no folio range, or a description that repeats content the lawyer has marked as exempt.
- What the lawyer does: The lawyer confirms the schedule matches the documents actually within scope, that each description discloses nothing exempt, and that the decision and the provision recorded against every row are their own.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Practical workflow informed by the linked primary sources; the traffic light and working checks are editorial guidance, not a court classification.
- Why: The level reflects what the work is, the consequence of an error, and how much of the output the lawyer must independently re-derive.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Confirm the instructions, the jurisdiction and the complete relevant material before starting.
2. The lawyer confirms the schedule matches the documents actually within scope, that each description discloses nothing exempt, and that the decision and the provision recorded against every row are their own.
3. Check the output against the source documents named in it before it is relied on.

## Notes

- These are suggested working checks. Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts; the checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

## Sources

- [https://www.oaic.gov.au/freedom-of-information/freedom-of-information-guidance-for-government-agencies/foi-guidelines/part-3-processing-and-deciding-on-requests-foi-access](https://www.oaic.gov.au/freedom-of-information/freedom-of-information-guidance-for-government-agencies/foi-guidelines/part-3-processing-and-deciding-on-requests-foi-access) (checked 2026-09-27)
- [https://www.oic.qld.gov.au/government/right-to-information/processing-an-rti-application](https://www.oic.qld.gov.au/government/right-to-information/processing-an-rti-application) (checked 2026-09-27)

## Jurisdiction versions

| Jurisdiction | Level |
| --- | --- |
| [United States](https://ailawframework.com/practice/administrative-and-public-law/build-the-schedule-of-documents-for-an-information-access-decision/united-states.md) | Green |

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*