---
title: "Build an AI-use gap table for an agency client"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/administrative-and-public-law/build-an-ai-use-gap-table-for-an-agency-client"
type: "task"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A31-T1-R12"
practice_area: "Administrative & Public Law"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
last_reviewed: "2026-10-22"
---

# Build an AI-use gap table for an agency client

> Map the agency's described AI uses to the government AI policy headings the lawyer has listed, and mark missing impact assessments and human-review paths.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/administrative-and-public-law/build-an-ai-use-gap-table-for-an-agency-client  
Last reviewed: 2026-10-22

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Administrative & Public Law](https://ailawframework.com/practice/administrative-and-public-law.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | Map the agency's described AI uses to the government AI policy headings the lawyer has listed, and mark missing impact assessments and human-review paths. |
| What the lawyer must review | Open the current mandatory policy for that government Do not rely on a knowledge-cutoff summary |
| Written for / versions | 1 jurisdiction versions below |

## Checking plan

**Source-by-source verification**

Trace relied-on content to independent sources and check for relevant material the output has missed.

- What the AI does: Potential support includes preparing preliminary structure or wording and identifying points for review. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
- What the lawyer does: Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Suggested checking approach based on the task guidance. Complete the assessment for the actual tool, information and jurisdiction.
- Why: The plan reflects the described work and review requirements. Policy colours are not used to determine permission or checking.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Confirm that the actual tool, feature and processing terms permit use of this information, including access, retention, training and disclosure conditions.
2. Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
3. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
4. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

## Notes

- Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

## Jurisdiction versions

| Jurisdiction | Level |
| --- | --- |
| [United States](https://ailawframework.com/practice/administrative-and-public-law/build-an-ai-use-gap-table-for-an-agency-client/united-states.md) | Yellow |

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*