---
title: "Assemble the decision-maker's lodgement bundle for a tribunal review"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/administrative-and-public-law/assemble-the-decision-maker-s-lodgement-bundle-for-a-tribunal-review"
type: "task"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A31-X20260927-8"
practice_area: "Administrative & Public Law"
tier: "green"
lawyer_review: "required"
last_reviewed: "2026-10-22"
---

# Assemble the decision-maker's lodgement bundle for a tribunal review

> Draft the index and apply the pagination across the document set the decision-maker has identified as relevant, in the order and form the tribunal's practice direction requires, and maintain the register of documents…

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/administrative-and-public-law/assemble-the-decision-maker-s-lodgement-bundle-for-a-tribunal-review  
Last reviewed: 2026-10-22

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Administrative & Public Law](https://ailawframework.com/practice/administrative-and-public-law.md) |
| Human involvement | Green: AI drafts, lawyer checks |
| How AI is used | Draft the index and apply the pagination across the document set the decision-maker has identified as relevant, in the order and form the tribunal's practice direction requires, and maintain the register of documents that come into the decision-maker's possession after lodgement, with the date each was received and the date it must be lodged by. |
| What the lawyer must review | The lawyer decides what is relevant to the review, settles any claim that material should be withheld from a party, confirms which jurisdictional-area practice direction applies, and signs the lodgement. |
| Written for / versions | 1 jurisdiction versions below |

## Checking plan

**Lawyer review required**

The responsible lawyer reviews the work against the instructions, sources and intended use.

- What the AI does: Draft the index and apply the pagination across the document set the decision-maker has identified as relevant, in the order and form the tribunal's practice direction requires, and maintain the register of documents that come into the decision-maker's possession after lodgement, with the date each was received and the date it must be lodged by.
- What the lawyer does: The lawyer decides what is relevant to the review, settles any claim that material should be withheld from a party, confirms which jurisdictional-area practice direction applies, and signs the lodgement.
- Who reviews: Responsible lawyer with competence in the matter
- Basis: Practical workflow informed by the linked primary sources; the traffic light and working checks are editorial guidance, not a court classification.
- Why: The level reflects what the work is, the consequence of an error, and how much of the output the lawyer must independently re-derive.

## Checks the lawyer makes

1. Confirm the instructions, the jurisdiction and the complete relevant material before starting.
2. The lawyer decides what is relevant to the review, settles any claim that material should be withheld from a party, confirms which jurisdictional-area practice direction applies, and signs the lodgement.
3. Check the output against the source documents named in it before it is relied on.

## Notes

- These are suggested working checks. Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts; the checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

## Sources

- [https://www.art.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-10/Administrative%20Review%20Tribunal%20%28Common%20Procedures%29%20Practice%20Direction.pdf](https://www.art.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-10/Administrative%20Review%20Tribunal%20%28Common%20Procedures%29%20Practice%20Direction.pdf) (checked 2026-09-27)

## Forms and precedents for this task

| Form or precedent | Kind | AI level | Summary |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Authority for a representative (Administrative Review Tribunal)](https://ailawframework.com/precedents/administrative-and-public-law/form-art-authority-for-representative.md) | Form | Yellow | Link to the Tribunal form 'Authority for representative', which the forms page says is used to appoint someone to act as a representative. |
| [Application to be made a party (Administrative Review Tribunal)](https://ailawframework.com/precedents/administrative-and-public-law/form-art-be-made-a-party.md) | Form | Yellow | Link to the Tribunal form to be made a party to a proceeding that affects the applicant's interests. |
| [Initiating application for a review (NTCAT Form 1): completion guide](https://ailawframework.com/precedents/administrative-and-public-law/form-ntcat-form1-review.md) | Form | Yellow | Link to the NTCAT page on making an application. Proceedings are commenced by Form 1. The page says the same form is used in the original and review jurisdictions. It is not the guardianship form. |
| [Application for miscellaneous matters (QCAT Form 40)](https://ailawframework.com/precedents/administrative-and-public-law/form-qld-qcat-40-miscellaneous.md) | Form | Yellow | Link to QCAT Form 40. The forms page lists directions, dismissal or strike-out, a closed hearing, a non-publication order, review of a rejected application, production, an adjournment, and other… |
| [Request for reasons for a QCAT decision](https://ailawframework.com/precedents/administrative-and-public-law/form-qld-qcat-request-reasons.md) | Form | Yellow | Link to QCAT's online request for reasons for a decision. The forms index lists it as its own online service. |

Signed-in accounts can read the full text of each one.

## Jurisdiction versions

| Jurisdiction | Level |
| --- | --- |
| [United States](https://ailawframework.com/practice/administrative-and-public-law/assemble-the-decision-maker-s-lodgement-bundle-for-a-tribunal-review/united-states.md) | Green |

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*