---
title: "List automated steps in an agency file against the review phrases"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/practice/administrative-and-public-law/advise-an-agency-on-ai-use-under-the-dta-policy-v2-0/united-states"
type: "task_jurisdiction_version"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "A31-B1-1-US"
practice_area: "Administrative & Public Law"
tier: "yellow"
lawyer_review: "required"
jurisdictions: ["US"]
last_reviewed: "2026-10-22"
---

# List automated steps in an agency file against the review phrases

> One row per step the file says a system performed. Columns are the step, the data the file says were used, and whether the file cites a procedure. Do not choose a ground of review and write no sentence of the advice.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/practice/administrative-and-public-law/advise-an-agency-on-ai-use-under-the-dta-policy-v2-0/united-states  
Last reviewed: 2026-10-22

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Practice area | [Administrative & Public Law](https://ailawframework.com/practice/administrative-and-public-law.md) |
| Human involvement | Yellow: Lawyer and AI draft together |
| How AI is used | One row per step the file says a system performed. Columns are the step, the data the file says were used, and whether the file cites a procedure. Do not choose a ground of review and write no sentence of the advice. |
| What the lawyer must review | 5 U.S.C. § 706 includes setting aside agency action that is arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law; in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right; or without observance of procedure required by law. 5 U.S.C. § 555(e) requires prompt notice of the denial of a written application, petition, or request in an agency proceeding, and a brief statement of the grounds, except when the denial affirms a prior denial or is self-explanatory. You write the advice. No digital-service policy was opened. |
| Written for | United States |
| Applies to | [Advise an agency on AI use under the DTA policy v2.0](https://ailawframework.com/practice/administrative-and-public-law/advise-an-agency-on-ai-use-under-the-dta-policy-v2-0.md) |

## Checking plan

- What the AI does: One row per step the file says a system performed. Columns are the step, the data the file says were used, and whether the file cites a procedure. Do not choose a ground of review and write no sentence of the advice.
- Basis: Checked against the linked sources on 22 October 2026. Confirm the current instrument before reliance.

## Notes

- Do not cite an agency technology policy. None was opened.
- State administrative procedure is not these sections.
- The table does not decide that a ground is made out.

## Sources

- [5 U.S.C. § 706, Scope of review](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/706) (checked 2026-10-22)
- [5 U.S.C. § 555, Ancillary matters](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/555) (checked 2026-10-22)

*Practice guidance for planning and review. Confirm current primary sources and the requirements of the actual matter. This is general information, not legal advice.*