---
title: "How to use AI for privacy impact assessments for AI in Australia"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/guides/privacy-impact-assessment-ai-australia"
type: "how_to_guide"
site: "AI Law Framework"
practice_area: "Regulation and government"
---

# How to use AI for privacy impact assessments for AI in Australia

> A privacy impact assessment for a tool maps where personal information goes, which principles apply, and what the firm will change. The OAIC and the NSW IPC both publish readings that belong in that map.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/guides/privacy-impact-assessment-ai-australia

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Check this before you rely on it

This guide is a method. It is not a privacy impact assessment, and it is not advice that a tool complies with the Privacy Act or a state Act.

## Steps

1. **Map the personal information.** Write down what goes in, who types it, which vendor and subprocessors see it, which country stores it, and what comes back out. Include prompts, documents, outputs and logs. The OAIC’s guidance on commercially available AI products is the Commonwealth reading of that flow. The hosting guide shows how to separate an Australian office from an Australian region.
2. **Apply the principles that actually bind.** Australian Privacy Principles bind APP entities. A state public sector may be under that state’s information privacy principles or a privacy Act instead. Do not paste the Commonwealth principles onto an agency they do not cover. The privacy and FOI tracker lists the regime page for each state.
3. **Use the NSW IPC guide where it is the right audience.** The Information and Privacy Commission NSW publishes guidance on generative AI privacy risks for the agencies it speaks to. Use it when you are in that audience. It is not a national template. Read the page, then write the assessment in the agency’s or firm’s words.
4. **Record the mitigations and who owns them.** For each risk, write the change: a different region, a ban on a class of document, a shorter retention, a human check, or a decision not to use the tool. Name the person who will do it and the date you will read it again. An assessment that ends at “risk: high” has not finished.

## Questions

**Is it allowed to use AI for privacy impact assessments for AI in Australia?**

A tool can help list flows you then check. The assessment is the firm’s or the agency’s. This page does not approve an automated PIA product.

**What tools are used for privacy impact assessments for AI?**

None is listed here as fit for the job. The sources are the OAIC’s commercial-AI guidance and, for its audience, the NSW IPC’s generative AI privacy guidance.

**Does hosting in Australia finish the assessment?**

No. Hosting is one fact. Collection, use, disclosure, retention and whether the principles apply are the rest.

## Sources

- [OAIC: commercially available AI products](https://www.oaic.gov.au/privacy/privacy-guidance-for-organisations-and-government-agencies/guidance-on-privacy-and-the-use-of-commercially-available-ai-products)
- [IPC NSW: GenAI privacy risks](https://www.ipc.nsw.gov.au/resources/guide-privacy-risks-associated-use-generative-ai-tools)

## Related

- [Privacy tasks](https://ailawframework.com/practice/privacy-data-protection-and-cyber.md)
- [Privacy and FOI tracker](https://ailawframework.com/ai-rules.md)
- [Australian data hosting](https://ailawframework.com/guides/australian-data-hosting-legal-ai.md)
- [Choosing a legal AI tool](https://ailawframework.com/guides/choose-legal-ai-tool-australia.md)