---
title: "How to use AI for personal injury commission matters in Australia"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/guides/ai-personal-injury-commission"
type: "how_to_guide"
site: "AI Law Framework"
practice_area: "Litigation and tribunals"
---

# How to use AI for personal injury commission matters in Australia

> Workers compensation and motor accident disputes in the Personal Injury Commission follow the Commission’s note, PIC13. A medical summary is checked against the report, not against a second model.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/guides/ai-personal-injury-commission

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

## Check this before you rely on it

SC Gen 23 does not bind the Commission merely because the practitioner is in New South Wales. Medical information does not go into a public tool unless PIC13 allows that environment.

## Steps

1. **Read PIC13 before you draft or upload.** The linked Commission note is PIC13. Open it for the commencement date, the disclosure rule and what may be put into a tool. Do not reuse a Supreme Court disclosure clause unless PIC13 uses the same rule. This site’s Commission page is a reminder to open that note, not a copy of it.
2. **Check medical summaries against the report.** Injuries, dates, percentages and the doctor’s conclusion are read off the report in the brief. A tool’s smoother summary is not the opinion. If an expert report is being prepared, read the expert-report guide and the note that binds the expert. Do not let a model rewrite a clinical finding you have not compared to the page.

## Questions

**Is it allowed to use AI for personal injury commission matters in Australia?**

Only in the way PIC13 allows. Open the Commission’s note. The Supreme Court note is a different document.

**What tools are used for personal injury commission matters?**

This page does not approve a medical-summary product. Keep medical information out of a public tool unless PIC13 allows it.

**Can a tool’s summary of a medico-legal report go into submissions unread?**

No. Read the report. The summary is a prompt to look, not the finding.

## Sources

- [NSW PIC13](https://www.pi.nsw.gov.au/resources/procedural-directions/procedural-direction-pic13-use-of-generative-artificial-intelligence)

## Related

- [Personal Injury Commission note](https://ailawframework.com/courts/nsw-personal-injury-commission-generative-ai.md)
- [Personal injury tasks](https://ailawframework.com/practice/personal-injury-and-compensation.md)
- [Expert reports](https://ailawframework.com/guides/ai-expert-reports-australia.md)